It is now clear that Bertrand Russell, the famous mathematician, logician and philosopher, has openly mocked our religion through his famous satire analog of the teapot. At other times, the reign of religions less permissive than ours, there is no doubt he would have been spent by iron and fire. But the Flying Spaghetti Monster in his immeasurable kindness, let Russell play with his nonsense as you leave a kitten to mumuse with a ball of wool.
The analogy of Bertrand Russell
If I were to suggest that between Earth and Mars is a teapot china elliptical orbit around the sun, nobody would be able to prove otherwise as long as I took the precaution of specifying that the teapot is too small to be detected by our most powerful telescopes. But if I said that, as my proposal can not be disproved, it is not tolerable for human reason to doubt, as soon as we consider myself a visionary. However, if the existence of this tea was described in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled in children at school, then any hesitation to believe in its existence become a mark of eccentricity and the skeptic would be the care of a psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisition in earlier times.
You can see where the philosopher is coming ... By using mockery to mock the divine, it suggests that some doctrines that might pass for illuminated itself uses subterfuge. Some have also taken the step in affirming thing.
It is useless for true believers attempt to contradict this type of connection, the author having repeatedly made a fool of himself, especially when he invented the proposal Atomic (as if a sentence could explode), or by asking the question silly: all sets not belonging to themselves he belongs to itself? or by asking the barber's paradox as follows: ¬ ∃ y ∀ x (x R y ⇔ ¬ x R x) ... We have seen clear ...
The theme of the pot taken by Richard Dawkins
needs no introduction Richard Dawkins, the famous British ethologist, and popularizer of evolutionary theorist, critic of intelligent design and taking into atheism. He is called the Rottweiler of Darwin is targeting all the gods and the supernatural in general, especially in his book For God Delusion .
As it seems important to identify Pastafari theses of their enemies, we will deliver the following development that Dawkins on Teapot Russell:
Organized religion deserves the utmost hostility because, unlike belief in Russell's teapot, organized religion is powerful, influential, tax-exempt and systematically passed on to children too young to defend themselves. We do not force children to spend their formative years memorizing books on wacky teapots. Public schools do not exclude children whose parents prefer the wrong shape of teapot. The faithful of the teapot does not stoning non-believers in the teapot, the teapot apostates, heretics of the teapot or the blasphemers of the teapot. Mothers do not prevent their son from marrying shiksas the teapot on the pretext that their parents believe in three teapots rather than one. Those who pay the milk first do not mutilate those who prefer to start by pouring the tea.
Everything and anything. When is a book entitled To finish with Richard Dawkins ?
We recall here that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is love, He expects us to eternity at the foot of the volcano of beer near the plant strippers (SEUS). This eschatological vision is far superior to materialistic visions of the two bitterly sad-lords mentioned above.
0 comments:
Post a Comment